NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+8169%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
17W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G86
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
