Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +2126%
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
153 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net