NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+1753%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GT216
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
