NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+1486%
34.1 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX A5500
+687%
15878
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX A5500
+751%
8016
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
10240
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA102
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
