Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +546%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA100
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy