Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1612MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +288%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2200 Mobile
77
RTX A2000 Embedded +2498%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro M2200 Mobile
42
RTX A2000 Embedded +545%
271

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net