Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1480MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +655%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP100
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy