Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q +62%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy