Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1747MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +536%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy