Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 55W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G71
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy