Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 1.02GB/s)
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1746MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +854%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
60
640
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Vega 20
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy