Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA L40

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA L40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 48GB VRAM L40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2490MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
17536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
L40 +6342%
90.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M
136
L40 +6875%
9486
VS
L40

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
2490 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
18176
40
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
478.1 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
90.52 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
90.52 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-895-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy