Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +12%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK106
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy