NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+311%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K620
696
Quadro K5200
+197%
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K620
240
Quadro K5200
+292%
941
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
