NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1550MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+2474%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
7168
24
TMUs
448
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
