Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q +2036%
8.033 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
GP104
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net