NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
+173%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK208
GPU Name
GF110
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
