NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+4365%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK208
GPU Name
DG2-512
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
