Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +22491%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G98
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
12W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy