Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1200MHz vs 902MHz)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000
5.196 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +53%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
3328
240
TMUs
104
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA106
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
12 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy