NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1612MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000
5.196 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+58%
8.253 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K6000
82
RTX A2000 Embedded
+230%
271
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
797 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2880
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
