NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+1211%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
+1423%
2072
Quadro 410
136
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
38W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
