NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1537MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
+77%
6.296 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
RTX A500 Mobile
+45%
3023
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
RTX A500 Mobile
+70%
1604
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A500 Mobile
+96%
576
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
