NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+227%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
