NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 226W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+825%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
226W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
