NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+4341%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
