NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+2093%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
2304
Shading Units
72
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
