Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +245%
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy