NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+1344%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
96
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
