NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+1168%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
112
192
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
