NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
8192
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
