Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (1480MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +43%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP106
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy