NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1306MHz vs 784MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+26%
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
