NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1600MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
15040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+2388%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
16384
112
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
600W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
