NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1124MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c
+250%
5.046 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2880
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
245W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
