Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2475MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
17536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +6152%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
18176
40
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy