Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +5434%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy