NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
+58%
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
576
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GF100
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
