NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+300%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
