Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1180MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla M6 +214%
3.625 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.52 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.625 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy