Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1557MHz vs 1124MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600 +3%
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P600
122
Quadro K1200 +7%
131
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy