Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (1442MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100 +191%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro GP100 +286%
7998
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro GP100 +333%
4076
Quadro K5200
941

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net