Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +197%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GF110
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
247W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy