NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+23480%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
Unknown
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
