NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+40785%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
46
16
Shading Units
5888
8
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
