NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+47871%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
34W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
