NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
+1220%
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
