NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+18054%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
DG2-128
NB9M-GLM
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
