NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+5490%
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
20
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GP104
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
