NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
GRID K1
+103%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
